Cases 11 - 20 of 39,737
Lenz v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv01510
Plaintiff:
Dakota Lenz
Defendant:
Warden Deshawn Jones, Deputy Warden Polite and Lt Shields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carson v. Pounds et al
as 1:2024cv02488
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Allyn Carson
Defendant:
Sheriff Tim Pounds, Head Nurse Germany and Douglas Count Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OLIVER v. OLIVER
as 5:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J OLIVER
Defendant:
TYRONE OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Bankhead v. Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv02387
Petitioner:
Diandra Bankhead
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOORE v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00181
Petitioner:
MARCUS MOORE
Respondent:
TYRONE OLIVER and Warden TIMOTHY SALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
FLORENCE v. HYLES et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Respondent:
U.S. MAGISTRATE STEPHEN HYLES, Judge CLAY D LAND, Judge BOBBY PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dent v. Adams
as 1:2024cv02453
Petitioner:
Terrance Dent
Respondent:
Robert Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rhodes v. G.S.P Georgia State Patrol et al
as 1:2024cv02454
Plaintiff:
Andre Lemar Rhodes
Defendant:
G.S.P Georgia State Patrol, G.S.P Officers and Officer Swain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Spalding County Law Authorities
as 3:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Charles Bernard Williams
Defendant:
Spalding County Law Authorities
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
