Cases 11 - 20 of 10,330
Ray v. Massey, et al
as 3:2024cv01563
Plaintiff:
Thomas Warren Ray
Defendant:
Caprice Massey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Blackburn et al
as 3:2024cv01566
Plaintiff:
Steven Anthony Nelson
Defendant:
Yon Blackburn, J. Hanson, Sergeant Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Koznek et al
as 3:2024cv01567
Defendant:
Dave Koznek, Nurse Betty, J. Hanson and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Anthony Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2024cv01498
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Superintendent Corey Fhuere and Oregon Board of Parole and Past Prisoner Supervision
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haret v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv01554
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Petitioner:
Abdirashid Haret
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stetzer v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv01555
Petitioner:
Joshua Thomas Stetzer
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Irvis v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv01556
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Petitioner:
Divine Son Irvis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Young v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv01557
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Petitioner:
Darryl William Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bishop v. Marion County Jail
as 6:2024cv01178
Plaintiff:
Travis Allan Bishop
Defendant:
Marion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kerr v. Multnomah County et al
as 3:2024cv01547
Defendant:
Dr. Lawson Eleazer, Multnomah County and Sheriff Nicole Morrisey O'Donnell
Plaintiff:
William David Kerr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
