Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Oregon
Cases 11 - 20 of 10,134
Watterson v. Miller
as 2:2024cv00732
Petitioner: Elijah Watterson
Respondent: Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tolbert v. Polk County Jail
as 3:2024cv00725
Plaintiff: Christopher C. Tolbert
Defendant: Polk County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goering-Runyan v. USA
as 3:2024cv00735
Petitioner: Daniel Lynn Goering-Runyan
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Taylor et al v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00726
Plaintiff: Jermel A. Taylor, Schylar Flick and Dywane Russell Crum
Defendant: Oregon Department of Corrections and Eastern Oregon Correction Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolbert v. Polk County Jail
as 6:2024cv00725
Plaintiff: Christopher C. Tolbert
Defendant: Polk County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Villers
as 2:2024cv00727
Plaintiff: Jermel A. Taylor
Defendant: P. Villers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. Ruby et al
as 6:2024cv00713
Plaintiff: Sidney V. Newton
Defendant: Officer Ruby, John Doe #2 and John Doe #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delfin v. Fhuere
as 6:2024cv00706
Petitioner: Jorge Delfin
Respondent: Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glassman v. Braun et al
as 6:2024cv00705
Plaintiff: Brandon C. Glassman
Defendant: Mark Braun, Bobbie France, Tina Lovik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Hapo Community Credit Union et al
as 2:2024cv00704
Plaintiff: Paul Dawson
Defendant: Hapo Community Credit Union and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?