Cases 21 - 30 of 121,040
(PC) Bennett v. Gockey et al
as 2:2024cv01776
Plaintiff:
David Bennett
Defendant:
Joseph Gockey, Elray Henry, Wenneker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward James Harris v. Tammy Campbell
as 5:2024cv01306
Petitioner:
Edward James Harris
Respondent:
Tammy Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Diaz v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv00745
Plaintiff:
Elias Serda Diaz
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Clay
as 4:2024cv03787
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Clarence Don Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Solvey v. CDCR, et al
as 2:2024cv01756
Plaintiff:
Stanley H. Solvey
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Anand Mehta, George and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Hernandez v. Schultz et al
as 1:2024cv00736
Petitioner:
Victor Alfonso Hernandez
Respondent:
Jason Schultz and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Merron v. Cavagnaro
as 1:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ryan Merron
Defendant:
Josie M. Cavagnaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Baker v. Macomber et al
as 1:2024cv00737
Plaintiff:
Jerome Baker
Defendant:
Jeffrey Macomber, Brian Phillips and Alva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Clay
as 2:2024cv01755
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Clarence Don Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Lane v. Cates et al
as 2:2024cv01763
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lane
Respondent:
Brian Cates and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
