Cases 31 - 40 of 44,700
Jones v. Hooker et al
as 3:2024cv03121
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Jones
Defendant:
. Hooker, 4th Dist Appt Ct Clerk (J Doe) or rep and Cynthia A Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dailey v. Arens et al
as 3:2024cv03120
Plaintiff:
Corey Dailey
Defendant:
. Arens, . Zanger, J Moon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2024cv03119
Plaintiff:
John Moore
Defendant:
State of Illinois and Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. White et al
as 1:2024cv04003
Plaintiff:
Dimari Terry
Defendant:
Raymond White, Reinaldo Sanchez, Jerrell Danner-Lardino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pierce v. Luking et al
as 3:2024cv01271
Plaintiff:
Darius Lee Pierce
Defendant:
Nurse Practitioner Luking, Nurse Fitzgerald, Mark Shima and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerome v. Peirce et al
as 1:2024cv03917
Plaintiff:
Innocent Jerome
Defendant:
Ms. Peirce, Ms. Ousley, Ms. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanke v. State of Illinois et al
as 4:2024cv04089
Plaintiff:
Jack Blanke
Defendant:
State of Illinois and Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bynum v. City of Bridgton Police Dept.
as 1:2024cv04029
Plaintiff:
Darryl R Bynum, Jr
Defendant:
City of Bridgton Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canty v. Lammer
as 4:2024cv04091
Petitioner:
Anthony Canty
Respondent:
B Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McClurge v. City of Chicago
as 1:2024cv03914
Plaintiff:
Christopher McClurge
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
