Cases 41 - 50 of 39,737
PARKER v. WILLIAMS et al
as 5:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
VRAIMONE GERMAINE PARKER
Defendant:
JOE WILLIAMS and GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC & CLASSIFICATION PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v All 7 Continents et al
as 4:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Denver Fenton Allen
Defendant:
All 7 continents, Millsapp, Dow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. All 7 continents et al
as 4:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Denver Fenton Allen
Defendant:
All 7 continents, Mas-Govt., MD Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. United States of America Govt. et al
as 4:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Denver Fenton Allen
Defendant:
United States of America Govt., All 7 Maj. Continents, FNM Hargrove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruddock v. Labat et al
as 1:2024cv02410
Petitioner:
O'Kang Andre Ruddock
Respondent:
Patrick Labat and Fulton County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SLATON v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2024cv00175
Petitioner:
MARCUS OCTAVIOUS SLATON
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bussey v. Phams
as 3:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
Arthur Shermaine Bussey
Respondent:
Angela Phams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Jones
as 1:2024cv02411
Petitioner:
Kaivon Mitchell
Respondent:
Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eaker v. Henderson et al
as 4:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Joshua Taylor Eaker
Defendant:
Nicholas Scott Henderson, William Ben Johnson and Nathan Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORRALL v. HOWARD et al
as 5:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MORRALL
Defendant:
ANITA HOWARD and SANDRA MATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
