Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in California
Cases 51 - 60 of 122,017
Trammell Robinson III v. Ridgecrest Superior Court
as 1:2024cv01106
Plaintiff: Trammell Glenn Robinson, III
Defendant: Ridgecrest Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Benanti v. Doerer
as 1:2024cv01108
Plaintiff: Matthew Higgins-Vogt, Aaron M. Carrion and Michael Benanti
Defendant: J. Doerer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Darrell King v. U.S.P. Victorville
as 5:2024cv01978
Petitioner: Darrell King
Respondent: U.S.P. Victorville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02000
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02001
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Bailey v. Borla
as 3:2024cv06542
Defendant: Ron E. Borla
Plaintiff: Jasper Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06539
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06543
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06544
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bunn v. Robertson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv06541
Defendant: James Robertson, Pelican Bay State Prison, Director of CDCR and others
Plaintiff: Gary Lamont Bunn, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?