Cases 71 - 80 of 15,723
Robertson (PS) v. Stancil
as 1:2024cv01203
Petitioner:
Lonnie Ray Robertson
Respondent:
Moses Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carey (PS) v. McCann et al
as 1:2024cv01137
Plaintiff:
Zhanda Carey
Defendant:
Beth McCann, Hayley Swestka, Marley Bordovsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale-El (PS) v. Florres
as 1:2024cv01017
Petitioner:
Colby Jerome Hale-El
Respondent:
Ryan Florres, Jaquez and Attorney General for the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Ceja
as 1:2024cv01598
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Rodriguez
Respondent:
D. Ceja
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cordova (PS) v. Diggins et al
as 1:2024cv01590
Petitioner:
Louis M. Cordova
Respondent:
Diggins and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robledo-Paralegal (PS) v. Executive Director of CDOC
as 1:2024cv01607
Petitioner:
Craig S. Robledo-Paralegal
Respondent:
Executive Director of CDOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crump (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2024cv01611
Petitioner:
Norvell Crump
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reed (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv01209
Plaintiff:
LaQuann Reed
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tapia (PS) v. Moore et al
as 1:2024cv01591
Plaintiff:
Julius Joel Tapia
Defendant:
Moore, Nathan B. and Idaho Springs Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson (PS) v. Davis
as 1:2024cv01579
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
