Cases 71 - 80 of 19,162
DYKEMAN v. FISHER et al
as 1:2024cv07358
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #3, R. BLIZZARD, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DYKEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv07668
Respondent:
BECKY SCOTT and HUDSON COUNTY JAIL
Petitioner:
KEITH RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MITCHELL v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD
as 3:2024cv08598
Plaintiff:
WILLIE MITCHELL
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HESTER v. EAISE et al
as 1:2024cv07235
Defendant:
SRGT. CANPOSS, MR. BLIZZARD, JOSHUA EAISE and others
Plaintiff:
CORNELL L. HESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AGUILERA-RIOS v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv08610
Petitioner:
PABLO AGUILERA-RIOS
Respondent:
WARDEN R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FIGUEROA v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv08611
Respondent:
MRS. THOMPSON
Petitioner:
JOSE FIGUEROA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ARBAUGH v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv08565
Petitioner:
JAMES DANIEL ARBAUGH
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LOPEZ v. CHETIRKIN
as 3:2024cv08586
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and ROBERT L. CHETIRKIN
Petitioner:
CARLOS M. LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALEJO-DEL ROSARIO v. WARDEN, FCI - FT. DIX
as 1:2024cv08592
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI - FT. DIX
Petitioner:
ELVI ALEJO-DEL ROSARIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VEGA v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv08599
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Petitioner:
MICHAEL VEGA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
