Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Guam
Cases 71 - 80 of 131
Tedtaotao v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00027
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Vincent T. Tedtaotao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Demos v. The State of Washington et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00024
Petitioner: John R. Demos, Jr
Respondent: The State of Washington and The United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Partovi v. Galoski et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00011
Plaintiff: Ali Partovi
Defendant: Joseph P. Galoski and Vida A. Leon Guerrero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kim v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00018
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Sang Ho Kim
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cabaccang v. USA
as 1:2008cv00016
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Richard Toves Cabaccang
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cabaccang v. USA
as 1:2008cv00017
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: James Toves Cabaccang
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cabaccang v. USA
as 1:2008cv00016
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Roy Toves Cabaccang
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cabaccang v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00015
Petitioner: Roy Toves Cabaccang
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Shinohara v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2008cv00011
Plaintiff: Gil A. Shinohara
Defendant: United States Marshals Service and Does 1 through 5
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dela Pena v. USA
as 1:2008cv00004
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Isagani P. Dela Pena, JR.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?