Cases 1 - 10 of 10,167
Taylor v. 21 Savage
as 2:2024cv00966
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor and Flat Out Society, Ltd.
Defendant:
21 Savage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ippolito et al v. Douglas County Jail
as 6:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
David Alen Ippolito, Donald James Hoke and David Allyn Brown
Defendant:
Douglas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kalonji v. Fhuere
as 6:2024cv00960
Petitioner:
Joseph Kalonji
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duren v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00961
Plaintiff:
Tyrone C Duren
Defendant:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Taylor v. Cardi B et al
as 2:2024cv00965
Plaintiff:
Jermel A. Taylor and New Muslim Party (N.I.U.A.)
Defendant:
Cardi B and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. E.O.C.I. et al
as 2:2024cv00950
Plaintiff:
Jermel A. Taylor and New Muslim Party
Defendant:
E.O.C.I. and Chaplain Zuleta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. The City of Eugene et al
as 6:2024cv00951
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hawkins
Defendant:
The City of Eugene, John I-V Does and Eugene Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Gullick et al
as 2:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Reginald Marcel Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Garth Gullick, Dr. Michael Adcox and Dr. Warren Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Taylor v. Pope
as 2:2024cv00643
Plaintiff:
Jermel A. Taylor
Defendant:
Timothy Ray Pope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fudge v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
James Charles Fudge, Bubba Fudge and Bubba
Defendant:
ODOC/Office-Pop-Mgr. Greg Jones, TRCI-Doc-Supt. T. Rumsey, TRCI-Doc-Supt. E. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
