Cases 161 - 170 of 31,644
ADRU Tech Ltd. v. DS Games Inc.
as 1:2024cv00901
Defendant:
DS Games Inc.
Plaintiff:
ADRU Tech Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00894
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Warren v. Results Customer Solutions, LLC
as 1:2024cv00888
Defendant:
Results Customer Solutions, LLC doing business as Results CX
Plaintiff:
Alesha Warren
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104 Worker Adjustment & Retraining Notification Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Smith Hopkins v. Tapp Networks, LLC
as 1:2024cv00890
Plaintiff:
Ashley Bianca Smith Hopkins
Defendant:
Tapp Networks, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Amazon Technologies, Inc. v. Nokia Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00891
Defendant:
Nokia of America Corporation, Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy and Nokia Corporation
Plaintiff:
Amazon Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
WiTricity Corporation v. Ideanomics, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00895
Defendant:
Ideanomics, Inc. and Wireless Advanced Vehicle Electrification, LLC
Plaintiff:
WiTricity Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement
Sylvester v. Laurel Alderman Court et al
as 1:2024cv00889
Plaintiff:
Michael Sylvester
Defendant:
Laurel Police Department, Sussex Correctional Institution, Laurel Alderman Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
