Cases 171 - 180 of 60,784
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01655
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sidhu v. Bean
as 2:2024cv01646
Petitioner:
Ramanjeet Sidhu
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Nevada and Jeremy Bean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morton v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00402
Defendant:
J. Benson, Pritchard, Hendley and others
Plaintiff:
David Morton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walsh v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv01638
Defendant:
Jeremy Bean, Frank Dreesen, James Scally and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeCoste v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv01639
Defendant:
Well Pass, Male Medical Personnel, Clark County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick DeCoste
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunn v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv01641
Defendant:
The County of Clark, The City of Indian Springs, The City of Ely and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Noel Nunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunn v. Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv01644
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Noel Nunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hagerman v. NDOC Medical et al
as 2:2024cv01645
Defendant:
Flores, Jason, Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Hagerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Magtech Industries Corporation v. Tenney
as 2:2024cv01636
Defendant:
GEORGE TENNEY
Plaintiff:
Magtech Industries Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
