Cases 21 - 30 of 24,536
Lacey Thorlton v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1852
Plaintiff:
LACEY THORLTON
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
Castro v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03964
Plaintiff:
Susana Castro
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Schnuckel v. Social Security
as 4:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Schnuckel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Peterson v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
Cristen Rose Peterson
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tate v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03922
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Tate
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Turner v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Steven L Turner
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hayes v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Irene Hayes
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kinsey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Tony P Kinsey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv03118
Plaintiff:
Crystal Smith
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ellert v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Clayton W Ellert
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
