Cases 41 - 50 of 137,302
Levin v. U.S. Internal Revenue Service
as 5:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Michelle A. Levin
Defendant:
U.S. Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wilkerson v. Steinger, Iscoe & Greene-II, P.A. et al
as 6:2024cv00869
Plaintiff:
Mahdiabdul Wilkerson
Defendant:
Steinger, Iscoe & Greene-II, P.A. and Quintessa LLC a Oklahoma Limited Liability Company doing business as Quintessa Marketing
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
BSD Capital, Inc. v. Thompson et al
as 1:2024mi00031
Plaintiff:
BSD Capital, Inc. doing business as Lendistry
Defendant:
Nile B. Thompson and Darryle M. Farrar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Hatton v. Southwest Recovery Services LLC
as 5:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Hatton
Defendant:
Southwest Recovery Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
tano v. Smart Bridge Consulting, LLC
as 0:2024cv60769
Plaintiff:
cesar tano
Defendant:
Smart Bridge Consulting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
