Cases 41 - 50 of 122,746
(PC) Lopez v. Luhan et al
as 2:2024cv01321
Plaintiff:
Elijah Lopez
Defendant:
Luhan, Chavez, Pohovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GILBERT v. Site Safe Traffic Safety and Signs
as 2:2024at00576
Plaintiff:
TODD GILBERT
Defendant:
Site Safe Traffic Safety and Signs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
(PC) Brenner v. Shirley et al
as 1:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
Zachary Will Brenner
Defendant:
Heather Shirley, James Cronjager and Scott Degough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lopez v. Luhan et al
as 1:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Elijah Lopez
Defendant:
Luhan, Chavez, Pohovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Richard v. Valencia et al
as 2:2024cv01332
Plaintiff:
Craig Richard
Defendant:
Valencia, Abukalam and Serna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Chan v. Newsom et al
as 2:2024cv01333
Plaintiff:
Saechao Chan
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom and Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Casey v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv01316
Plaintiff:
Sean L. Casey, II
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, Igbokwe and Rojas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munoz et al v. State of California et al
as 1:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
Bryan Munoz, Maritsa Molina, Jerry Munoz-Molina and others
Defendant:
State of California, County of Tulare, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Rico-Scott v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 2:2024cv01313
Plaintiff:
Deborah Ann Rico-Scott
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
