Cases 61 - 70 of 76,859
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01333
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY v. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE et al
as 1:2024cv01328
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant:
U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and MARTHA WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540 Endangered Species Act
American Exploration & Production Council v. EPA, et al
as 24-1117
Petitioner:
American Exploration & Production Council
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Air Alliance Houston, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1118
Petitioner:
Air Alliance Houston, Clean Air Council and Environmental Integrity Project
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
WALTON v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2024cv01343
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH WALTON
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, FANNIE MAE, CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
HALE EL v. STATE OF COLORADO et al
as 1:2024cv00286
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEEPLES v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2024cv01017
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUSSMAN v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv01316
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MASON BUSSMAN
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC and Bruceline C. Fru
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
MATHIS et al v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2024cv01312
Plaintiff:
W. MATHIS and K. DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
