Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Commerce Park Realty, LLC, et al v. HR2-A Corp, et al
as 13-2193
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COMMERCE PARK REALTY, LLC, COMMERCE PARK PROPERTIES, LLC, COMMERCE PARK COMMONS, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellant:
HR2-A CORP, as general partner of HR2-A Limited Partnership, HR4-A CORP, as general partner of HR4-A Limited Partnership, MR4A-JV CORP, as general manager of MR4A-JV Limited Partnership and others
Defendant:
POTOMAC REALTY CAPITAL, LLC, BRADCO SUPPLY CORP., CONCRETE SYSTEMS INC and others
Wiener v. Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc., et al
as 11-1446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY WIENER, Derivatively on behalf of Eaton Vance Municipals Trust
Defendant - Appellee:
EATON VANCE DISTRIBUTORS, INC., BENJAMIN ESTY, ALLEN R. FREEDMAN and others
Peckler, et al v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., et al
as 10-1124
Plaintiff:
MAXWELL PECKLER, GARY H. COHEN, JAMES B. PINDER and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEROME RENAUDIN and STEVEN RODEMER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS, INC., SMITH BARNEY INC., CITIFINANCIAL, INC. and others
Erlich v. Ouellette, LaBonte, Roberge, et al
as 10-1160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK ERLICH, as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of The New England Carpenters Pension Fund
Defendant - Appellee:
OUELLETTE, LABONTE, ROBERGE AND ALLEN, P.A. and S.R. THOMAS ACTUARIAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
Erlich v. Ouellette LaBonte Roberge and, et al
as 10-1055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK ERLICH, as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of The New England Carpenters Pension Fund
Defendant - Appellee:
OUELLETTE, LABONTE, ROBERGE AND ALLEN, P.A.
Casual Male Retail, et al v. Yarbrough, et al
as 08-1068
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CASUAL MALE RETAIL CASUAL MALE RETAIL GROUP, INC. and CASUAL MALE RBT, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT H. YARBROUGH and RKC MAIL, LLC, d/b/a Mile Post Four
Defendant:
WESTPORT BIG & TALL WESTPORT BIG & TALL, INC., WESTPORT BIG & TALL WESTPORT BIG & TALL, INC., Westport Big & Tall, LLC, MATTHEW MEHLING and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
