Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Portland Pilots, Inc. v. Nova Star M/V
as 16-2467
Plaintiff:
PORTLAND PILOTS, INC., WORLD FUEL SERVICES, INC., d/b/a Trans-Tec, SPRAGUE OPERATING RESOURCES, LLC and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAINE UNIFORM RENTAL INC., d/b/a Pratt Abbott Uniform & Linen
Defendant - Appellee:
NOVA STAR M/V
Defendant:
NOVA STAR CRUISES LTD, in personam, SINGAPORE TECHNOLOGIES MARINE LIMITED, quasi in rem and BUNKERS AND RELATED FUEL ABOARD THE M/V NOVA STAR, in rem
Interested Party:
MASTER OF THE M/V NOVA STAR, PETER K. LYONS, CENTURY RESORTS INTERNATIONAL LTD and others
Massachusetts Retirement Syste, et al v. CVS Caremark Corporation, et al
as 12-1900
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MASSACHUSETTS RETIREMENT SYSTEMS, Lead Plaintiff (City of Brockton Retirement System; Plymouth County Retirement System; Norfolk County Retirement System)
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MEDOFF, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
CVS/CAREMARK, THOMAS M. RYAN, DAVID B. RICKARD and others
Automotive Industries Pension v. Textron Inc., et al
as 11-2106
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITY OF ROSEVILLE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES PENSION TRUST FUND AND THE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
Plaintiff:
OKLAHOMA FIREFIGHTERS PENSION & RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXTRON INC., LEWIS B. CAMPBELL, TED R. FRENCH and others
Interested Party:
CLEVELAND BAKERS & TEAMSTERS PENSION FUND, LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, CLEVELAND BAKERS & TEAMSTERS HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and others
Picciotto, et al v. Continental Casualty, et al
as 06-2685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEFANO PICCIOTTO, JUDITH PICCIOTTO, ATHENA PICCIOTTO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Continental Casualty Company, GREAT NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY, HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
NEUROLOGICAL NEUROLOGICAL REFERRAL CENTER INC. and ROBERTA F. WHITE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
