Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Robb Evans & Associates, LLC v. US
as 15-2552
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBB EVANS & ASSOCIATES, LLC, as Receiver over the assets of John Puccio and Richard Puccio and as Receiver over Cambridge Credit Corp., Brighton Credit Corp. Cambridge Brighton Budget Planning Corp., Brighton Credit Management Corp., Brighton Credit Corp
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Robb Evans & Associates, LLC v. US
as 15-2540
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROBB EVANS & ASSOCIATES, LLC, as Receiver over the assets of John Puccio and Richard Puccio and as Receiver over Cambridge Credit Corp., Brighton Credit Corp. Cambridge Brighton Budget Planning Corp., Brighton Credit Management Corp., Brighton Credit Corp
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Malouf, et al v. U.S. Department of the Treasur, et al
as 14-1147
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN R. MALOUF
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN MORTGAGE NETWORK, INC. and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Defendant:
CITIZENS BANK OF MASSACHUSETTS, RBS CITIZENS, N.A. and MARIA ROSARIO MALOUF
Fidelity International v. US
as 10-2421
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY ADVISOR A FUND, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
BDO SEIDMAN, LLP, MICHAEL J. EGAN, JOHN R. EGAN and others
US v. Dolan, Jr., et al
as 10-1567
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN A. DOLAN, JR. and JOHN A. DOLAN, SR.
Defendant:
KEYBANK and MA DEPT OF REVENUE
US v. Beauchamp, et al
as 09-1917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellee:
WAYNE BEAUCHAMP, KEITH BEAUCHAMP and DEAN COOPERATIVE BANK
Interested Party - Interested Party:
JOHN T. SHEEHAN
Sugarloaf Funding, LLC, et al v. US Dept of the Treasury
as 08-2515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUGARLOAF FUNDING, LLC, DERRINGER TRADING, LLC, KNIGHT TRADING, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
US DEPT OF TREASURY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
