Cases 91 - 100 of 221
US v. Rosario-Santiago
as 16-1600
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
LUIS JOEL ROSARIO-SANTIAGO, a/k/a Triple-H, a/k/a Luis Jo
Gonzalez Lopez, et al v. Otero, et al
as 16-1572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICENTE GONZALEZ LOPEZ, LINNETTE MUNOZ-SANTIAGO, VICTOR FRANCO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
OCTAVIO OTERO, an investigator with the Department of the Army Civilian Police, in his personal and official capacities, EDWIN SEPULVEDA, an investigator with the Department of the Army Civilian Police, in his personal and official capacities, STEPHEN ACKMAN, Garrison Commander, Ft. Buchanan, in his personal and official capacities and others
US v. Guzman-Santiago
as 16-1595
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
GIOVANNI GUZMAN-SANTIAGO
US v. Santiago-Baez
as 16-1580
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
LUIS ENRIQUE SANTIAGO-BAEZ, a/k/a El Loco
Gonzalez-Morales v. Presbyterian Community Hospita, et al
as 16-1263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ZORAIDA GONZALEZ-MORALES
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC., RAUL A. VALE-FLORES, JOSE DUENO-QUINONES and others
Third Party Defendant:
SIMED
US v. Reyes Lara
as 16-1235
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
SANTIAGO MARINO REYES LARA
US v. Santiago-Velez
as 16-1164
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN C. SANTIAGO-VELEZ, a/k/a Cabestro, a/k/a El Gordo
US v. Aviles-Santiago
as 16-1127
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
ALEXANDER AVILES-SANTIAGO, a/k/a Pipo, a/k/a Pipo El Mono
US v. Berrios-Rodriguez
as 15-2478
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JAYSON BERRIOS-RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Jayson
Interested Party:
LETICIA DIAZ-SANTIAGO and YANIRA GRAJALES-DIAZ
US v. Otero-Marquez
as 15-2244
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
EDWIN OTERO-MARQUEZ
Interested Party:
LOURDES BOBE-SANTIAGO, Registrar of Property of Humacao
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
