Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 95
Santos-Velasquez, et al v. Garland
as 22-1235
Petitioner: CELINDA DEL MILAGRO SANTOS-VELASQUEZ and RONALD ALEXANDER ORELLANA-SANTOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND
Dr. T., et al v. McKee, et al
as 22-1073
Plaintiff / Appellant: DR. T., HOSP. CLERK M., HEALTH UNIT COORDINATOR L. and others
Plaintiff: NURSE L.
Defendant / Appellee: NICOLE ALEXANDER-SCOTT, in her official capacity as Director of Rhode Department of Health, DANIEL J. MCKEE, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Rhode Island and JAMES MCDONALD, in his official capacity as Interim Acting Director of the Rhode Island Department of Health
Alexander v. US
as 22-1041
Petitioner: RAY L. ALEXANDER
Respondent: UNITED STATES
US v. Simo-Mariano
as 21-1897
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: ALEXANDER SIMO-MARIANO
Reyes Pujols v. Garland
as 21-1590
Petitioner: ZEIKE ALEXANDER REYES PUJOLS, a/k/a Jose Gonsalez-Rodriguez
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Nickerson v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections, et al
as 21-1444
Defendant: JAMES WEEDEN, Warden, CRANSTON, RI, C.O. OLIVER and others
Interested Party: KENDALL JOHNSON and CODY-ALLEN ZAB
Defendant / Appellee: RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, JENNIFER CLARKE, Medical Doctor, CORY K. CLOUD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JASON LAMONTE NICKERSON
Petitioner: JOSEPH W. SHEPARD, JOHN PACHECO, JR. and QUANDELL HUSBAND
US v. Gormatov
as 21-1433
Defendant / Appellant: ALEXANDER GORMATOV, a/k/a Sasha
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Miranda Almeida v. Garland
as 21-1392
Petitioner: ULISSES ALEXANDER MIRANDA ALMEIDA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND
Chavez v. Garland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1267
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND
Petitioner: ROMMEL ALEXANDER CHAVEZ
US v. Greaux-Gomez
as 21-1179
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: ALEXANDER GREAUX-GOMEZ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?