Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
In Re: Oliver
as 23-1184
Petitioner: THOMAS OLIVER
Respondent: JOSEPH L. MICHAUD, individually and in his official capacity, MATTHEW H. MICHAUD, individually and in his official capacity, DOUGLAS H. SMITH, individually and in his official capacity and others
US v. Carter
as 21-1019
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: TASHEEM CARTER, a/k/a Cook
US v. Carter We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1953
Defendant / Appellant: DIOVANNI CARTER
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Rourke v. Carter, et al
as 19-2256
Defendant / Appellee: JIMMY CARTER, President and US AIR FORCE
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES ROURKE
US v. Carter We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1644
Interested Party: MATTHEW CADDEN, EMILIA CADDEN, E. R. CADDEN and others
Appellant: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellee: SHARON P. CARTER
Carter v. US
as 19-1473
Petitioner / Appellant: ROBERT KELLY CARTER
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES
US v. Carter
as 17-1738
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: WAYNE CARTER
The Dial Corporation v. Carter, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-8009
Plaintiff - Respondent: MICHELLE CARTER, JONATHAN CESSNA, ALICIA GENTILE and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL FEUER, MARTIN HOMMEL, KAMI RALEIGH and others
Defendant - Petitioner: DIAL CORP.
Defendant: HENKEL CONSUMER GOODS, INC.
Interested Party: RHONDA D. JONES
The Dial Corporation v. Carter, et al
as 17-8009
Respondent: MICHELLE CARTER, JONATHAN CESSNA, ALICIA GENTILE and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL FEUER, MARTIN HOMMEL, KAMI RALEIGH and others
Petitioner: DIAL CORP.
Defendant: HENKEL CONSUMER GOODS, INC.
Interested Party: RHONDA D. JONES
US v. Flores-Carter We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2226
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: ASHLEY FLORES-CARTER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?