Cases 1 - 6 of 6
US v. Stergio
as 15-2431
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES D. STERGIOS
Interested Party:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK and TD BANK
US v. Stergio
as 15-2432
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES D. STERGIOS
Interested Party:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK and TD BANK
Zimmerman, et al v. Puccio, et al
as 09-2250
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANDREW ZIMMERMAN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and KELLY ZIMMERMAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIGHTON CREDIT CORP., BRIGHTON CREDIT CORP., of Massachusetts, BRIGHTON DEBT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LTD. and others
Movant - Appellant:
KAREN PUCCIO
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, U.S.A N.A., PROVIDIAN BANCORP SERVICES and others
Interested Party:
ROBB EVANS & ASSOCIATES, LLC
Interested Party - Interested Party:
SPENCER SAVINGS BANK SLA
Zimmerman, et al v. Puccio, et al
as 09-1416
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANDREW ZIMMERMAN, On behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated and KELLY ZIMMERMAN
Defendant:
CAMBRIDGE CREDIT COUNSELING CORP., CAMBRIDGE/BRIGHTON BUDGET PLANNING CORP., CAMBRIDGE CREDIT CORP. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN PUCCIO and RICHARD PUCCIO
:
Andrew Zimmerman, et al v. Cambridge Credit Counseling, et al
as 09-1034
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANDREW ZIMMERMAN, On behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated and KELLY ZIMMERMAN
Defendant - Appellant:
CAMBRIDGE CREDIT COUNSELING CORP., CAMBRIDGE/BRIGHTON BUDGET PLANNING CORP., CAMBRIDGE CREDIT CORP. and others
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE BANK, CAPITAL ONE FSB, CAPITAL ONE SERVICES and others
:
US v. Stepanian
as 08-1053
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
:
COASTWAY CREDIT UNION, COVENTRY CREDIT UNION, DISCOVER FINANCIAL and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MIKAEL STEPANIAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
