Cases 21 - 30 of 41
In re: Tripp
as 15-1774
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS TRIPP
Respondent:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, MICHAEL CORSINI, LUIS SPENCER and others
Interested Party - Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Reedom v. Colvin
as 15-1358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES PATRICK REEDOM
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Diplock v. Colvin
as 15-1269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES ROBERT DIPLOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Moriarty v. Colvin
as 15-1165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARSHALL THEODORE MORIARTY, Esq., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Respondent - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security of the United States
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Stewart v. Colvin
as 15-1162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHERRI STEWART
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Fischer v. Colvin
as 15-1041
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GLORIA GEAN FISCHER
Defendant - Appellant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security
Peltonovich v. Colvin
as 14-2212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANET PELTONOVICH
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Haworth v. Colvin
as 14-2084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLTON D. HAWORTH, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Hartigan v. Colvin
as 14-2052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYNNE HARTIGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Franklin v. Colvin
as 14-1889
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOM FRANKLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
