Cases 21 - 30 of 95
Tavares v. Macomber, et al
as 20-1952
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTOR A. TAVARES
Defendant / Appellee:
C/O SPADONI, C/O ANTONELLI, JOSHUA MACOMBER, Lieutenant and others
Defendant:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PATRICIA ANNE COYNE-FAGUE, in her official capacity as Director of the Rhode Island Department of Corrections
Tavares v. Macomber, et al
as 20-1921
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTOR A. TAVARES
Defendant / Appellee:
C/O SPADONI, C/O SANTA GATA, C/O ANTONELLI and others
Defendant:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PATRICIA ANNE COYNE-FAGUE, in her official capacity as Director of the Rhode Island Department of Corrections
Lima v. City of East Providence, et al
as 20-1688
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NADINE E. LIMA
Defendant / Appellee:
EAST PROVIDENCE, RI, by and through its Finance Director, Malcolm Moore, KATHRYN CROWLEY, individually and in her official capacity as Superintendent of the City of East Providence School Department and EAST PROVIDENCE SCHOOL DEPARTMENT, by and through its Superintendent, individually and in her official capacity, Kathryn Crowley
US v. Greenlaw
as 20-1168
Interested Party:
CNA WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, JP, Lockport, NY, MP, Ochard Park, NY and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
MELISSA ANN GREENLAW, a/k/a Melissa Belanger, a/k/a Melissa Moore
Tavares v. Kettle, et al
as 19-2226
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY ACETO, MICHAEL W. MOORE, DISCIPLINARY HEARING OFFICER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTOR A. TAVARES, Ex. Rel United States and State of Rhode Island
US v. Moore-Bush
as 19-1625
Defendant / Appellee:
NIA MOORE-BUSH, a/k/a Nia Dinzey
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
US v. Moore-Bush
as 19-1582
Defendant / Appellee:
NIA MOORE-BUSH, a/k/a Nia Dinzey
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
US v. Stile
as 19-1408
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES STILE
Interested Party:
E.W. MOORE & SON PHARMACY and HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
