Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Kaufman, et al v. Shulman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-2017
Petitioner - Appellee: GORDAN KAUFMAN and LORNA KAUFMAN
Respondent - Appellant: DOUGLAS SHULMAN, Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Kaufman, et al v. Shulman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-2022
Petitioner - Appellant: GORDAN KAUFMAN and LORNA KAUFMAN
Respondent - Appellee: DOUGLAS SHULMAN, Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Haag v. Shulman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1979
Petitioner - Appellant: KATHLEEN HAAG
Respondent - Appellee: DOUGLAS SHULMAN, Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
West v. Shulman
as 11-1008
Petitioner: DAVID WEST
Respondent: DOUGLAS SHULMAN, Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Demarkis v. Commissioner of IRS
as 10-1919
Petitioner - Appellant: JOHN DEMARKIS
Respondent - Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Recovery Group, Inc., et al v. Commissioner of IRS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1886
Petitioner - Appellant: RECOVERY GROUP, INC., ROBERT J. GLENDON, YVONNE M. GLENDON and others
Respondent - Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Latos v. Commissioner of IRS
as 10-1799
Petitioner: JAMES E. ANDERSON
Petitioner - Appellant: CHERYL J. LATOS
Respondent - Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Menayat, et al v. Commissioner of IRS
as 10-1730
Petitioner: MOHAMMED REZA ENAYAT and WOODBURY RUG COMPANY, INC.
Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Burke v. Commissioner of IRS
as 10-1571
Petitioner - Appellant: TIMOTHY J. BURKE
Respondent - Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cote v. Shulman
as 10-1051
Petitioner - Appellant: DIANA COTE
Respondent - Appellee: DOUGLAS SHULMAN, Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?