Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Cases 31 - 40 of 72
US v. Cohen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1682
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: R. DAVID COHEN
Interested Party: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1514
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
US v. Gonzalez-Martin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1318
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: ALLISON GONZALEZ-MARTINEZ
Interested Party: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
In Re: Armando Pon
as 14-2101
Petitioner: ARMANDO PONS
Respondent: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE and others
In Re: Armando Pon
as 14-2102
Petitioner: ARMANDO PONS
Respondent: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE and others
Kaufman, et al v. Commisioner of Internal Revenu We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1863
Petitioner - Appellant: GORDON KAUFMAN and LORNA KAUFMAN
Respondent - Appellee: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
West v. Koskinen
as 14-1679
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVID WEST
Respondent - Appellee: JOHN KOSKINEN, Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Malouf, et al v. U.S. Department of the Treasur, et al
as 14-1147
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN R. MALOUF
Defendant - Appellee: AMERICAN MORTGAGE NETWORK, INC. and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Defendant: CITIZENS BANK OF MASSACHUSETTS, RBS CITIZENS, N.A. and MARIA ROSARIO MALOUF
Latos v. Werfel
as 13-1758
Petitioner - Appellant: CHERYL J. LATOS
Respondent - Appellee: DANIEL I. WERFEL, Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Latos v. Werfel
as 13-1759
Petitioner - Appellant: CHERYL J. LATOS
Respondent - Appellee: DANIEL I. WERFEL, Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?