Cases 41 - 50 of 207
Hiram Perez-Soto v. Oronoz, et al
as 21-1404
Defendant / Appellee:
MIGDALIA FRATICELLI-TORRES, Judge of the Appeals Court, HON. GISELLE ROMERO-GARCIA, Judge of The Intermediate Appeals Court of Puerto Rico, SIXTO HERNANDEZ-SERRANO, Judge of the Appeals Court and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HIRAM I. PEREZ-SOTO
In re: Levine
as 21-8005
Respondent:
KENNETH M. LEVINE
Interested Party:
MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS and MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT
In re: Belanger
as 21-8003
Interested Party:
MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS and MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT
Respondent:
LISA SIEGEL BELANGER
Sineni
as 20-8023
Interested Party:
ME SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT
Respondent:
In re: ANTHONY JOHN SINENI, III
In Re: Martin
as 20-8022
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT and MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS
Respondent:
DOUGLAS MARTIN
In Re: Dunne
as 20-8021
Respondent:
COLLEEN MARIE DUNNE
Interested Party:
MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS and MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT
In Re: Perez-Soto
as 20-1851
Respondent:
ROBERTO FELIBERTI-CINTRON, Judge of the Supreme Court, ANDRES SALAS-SOLER, Judge of the Appeals Court, HON. CARLOS CANDELARIA-ROSA, Judge of The Intermediate Appeals Court of Puerto Rico and others
Petitioner:
HIRAM I. PEREZ-SOTO
US v. MacGregor
as 20-1794
Defendant / Appellant:
WESLEY MACGREGOR
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, AD HOC COMMITTEE FOR JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
US v. Joseph
as 20-1787
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, AD HOC COMMITTEE FOR JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SHELLEY M. RICHMOND JOSEPH
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
In re: Ablitt
as 20-8019
Interested Party:
MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS and MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT
Respondent:
STEVEN A. ABLITT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
