Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Smith v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 24-1093
Plaintiff:
PAMELA SMITH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Adedeji v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 23-1698
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEHINDE OLATUNJI ADEDEJI
Defendant / Appellee:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., the company
Jimenez-Otero, et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., et al
as 23-1449
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGEL JIMENEZ-OTERO and MARIA COLON-RAMIREZ
Plaintiff:
PUERTO RICO AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION
Defendant / Appellee:
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. and TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Defendant:
CHARLES L. HAMILTON, GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY and GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY
Williams v. Kawasaki Motors Corp., U.S.A., et al
as 21-1442
Defendant / Appellee:
KAWASAKI HEAVY INDUSTRIES (USA), INC., d/b/a Kawasaki Motorcycles USA, LLC and KAWASAKI MOTORS CORP., U.S.A.
Defendant:
KAWASAKI MOTORS MANUFACTURING CORP., USA, KAWASAKI MOTORCYCLES USA, LLC, KAWASAKI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRESLAN A. WILLIAMS, as personal representative of the Estate of Junior Williams
Alvarez-Cabrera, et al v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. Inc., et al
as 20-1798
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TATIANA ALVAREZ-PEREZ, SANDRA PEREZ-MENDEZ and LUIS ALVAREZ-CABRERA
Defendant / Appellee:
TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. and TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC.
Ahold U.S.A., Inc. v. Warner Chilcott Public Limited, et al
as 19-8014
Petitioner:
WARNER CHILCOTT SALES (US), LLC, WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KROGER COMPANY, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE BENEFITS FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MARY ALEXANDER, a resident citizen of the State of North Carolina, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Interested Party:
BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC,, CAREMARK, LLC and CVS HEALTH CORPORATION
Defendant:
ALLERGAN, PLC, LUPIN LTD., WARNER CHILCOTT CORPORATION and others
Respondent:
AHOLD U.S.A., INC.
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, ASSOCIATION FOR ACCESSIBLE MEDICINES, PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA and others
City of Providence, et al v. Warner Chilcott (US), LLC, et al
as 19-8026
Petitioner:
WARNER CHILCOTT SALES (US), LLC, WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
KROGER COMPANY, MARY ALEXANDER, a resident citizen of the State of North Carolina, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, WALGREEN CO. and others
Respondent:
ELECTRICAL WORKERS 242 & 294 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 35 HEALTH CARE FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Interested Party:
BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC,, CAREMARK, LLC and CVS HEALTH CORPORATION
Defendant:
ALLERGAN, PLC, WARNER CHILCOTT HOLDINGS COMPANY III, LTD., LUPIN LTD. and others
Satchi v. Rheon U.S.A.
as 17-1640
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THIRU SATCHI, as administrator of the estate of Yogambigai Pasupathipillai
Defendant - Appellee:
RHEON U.S.A
Defendant:
INTRALOX, LLC
Meijer, Inc., et al v. Ranbaxy Inc., et al
as 17-8008
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC. and MEIJER, INC.
Defendant:
RANBAXY U.S.A. INC. and RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD.
Defendant - Petitioner:
RANBAXY INC. and SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD.
McKeague v. One World Technologies, Inc., et al
as 16-2148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODD MCKEAGUE
Defendant - Appellee:
ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RYOBI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
