Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1379
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MacNaughton v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, et al
as 23-1366
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY MACNAUGHTON, MD
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and UNUM GROUP
Cay-Montanez v. AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company, et al
as 21-1876
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIO M. CAY-MONTANEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, DISABILITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., UNUM GROUP and others
Defendant:
TERESA DALMAU, JEFFREY HARRIS GREEN, JOHN J. SZLYK and others
Ovist v. Unum Life Ins Co(.) of America, et al
as 20-1464
Defendant / Appellee:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and UNUM GROUP
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RHONDA OVIST
Lyman v. Unum Group, et al
as 19-1588
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NANCY LYMAN
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS TEACHERS ASSOCIATION PLAN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNUM GROUP and UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Host v. First Unum Life Ins. Co., et al
as 19-1228
Defendant / Appellee:
FIRST UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and UNUM GROUP
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN HOST
Unum Group, et al v. Benefit Partnership, Inc., et al
as 13-1588
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNUM GROUP and PROVIDENT LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE, CO.
Defendant - Appellant:
BENEFIT PARTNERSHIP, INC. and MICHAEL P. IPPOLITO
Defendant:
AMERITAS LIFE INSURANCE CORP., RELIASTAR, LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, CONNECTICARE OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC. and others
Defendant - Interested Party:
AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Trustee:
FLORENCE SAVINGS BANK and JAMES G. WOODWARD
US v. UNUM GROUP
as 09-1606
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES and PATRICK J. LOUGHREN
Defendant - Appellant:
UNUM GROUP, a/k/a Unum Provident Corporation, a/k/a Unum
Defendant:
GENEX SERVICES, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN BENEFITS COUNCIL
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
