Cases 91 - 100 of 137
USA (Rural Development) v. Doe et al
as 3:2009cv01048
Plaintiff:
USA (Rural Development)
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
United States of America v. Doe et al
as 3:2009cv01047
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA (Rural Development) v. Doe et al
as 3:2009cv01044
Plaintiff:
USA (Rural Development)
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA (Rural Development) v. Doe et al
as 3:2009cv01043
Plaintiff:
USA (Rural Development)
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA (Rural Development) v. Doe et al
as 3:2009cv01042
Plaintiff:
USA (Rural Development)
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA (Rural Development) v. DOE et al
as 3:2009cv01039
Plaintiff:
USA (Rural Development)
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA (Housing & Urban Development) v. Doe, et.al.
as 3:2009cv01040
Plaintiff:
USA (Housing & Urban Development)
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
US v. Piza-Blondet
as 08-2263
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
33.92356 ACRES OF LAND, more or less, situated in Vega Baja, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, for the Commonwealth of PR
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN PIZA-BLONDET
USA (Rural Development) v. DOE et al
as 3:2008cv01644
Plaintiff:
USA (Rural Development)
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA (Rural Development) v. John Doe et al.
as 3:2008cv01631
Plaintiff:
USA (Rural Development)
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
