Cases 111 - 120 of 2,158
Marsh et al v. Cadence Bank
as 1:2023cv12974
Plaintiff:
Cris Marsh and Taylor Marsh
Defendant:
Cadence Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pratt v. Cadence Bank
as 1:2023cv12996
Plaintiff:
Tammy Pratt
Defendant:
Cadence Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
KEENAN v. CARESOURCE, CORP. et al
as 1:2023cv12994
Plaintiff:
WYATT KEENAN
Defendant:
CARESOURCE, CORP. and CARESOURCE INDIANA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Stark v. Progress Software Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv13054
Plaintiff:
Pamela Stark
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation and Caresource
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Butts v. Radius Global Solutions, LLC
as 1:2023cv13233
Plaintiff:
Wayne Butts
Defendant:
Radius Global Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BRONSON v. FRANKLIN MINT FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
as 1:2023cv12893
Plaintiff:
Tanya Bronson
Defendant:
Franklin Mint Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BROWN v. FRANKLIN MINT FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
as 1:2023cv12894
Plaintiff:
Steven Brown
Defendant:
Franklin Mint Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1715
Walles et al v. Autozone, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv12889
Plaintiff:
Kevin Walles and Jose Vargas
Defendant:
Autozone, Inc. and Progress Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Rosenbaum v. Columbia Banking Systems Inc
as 1:2023cv13234
Plaintiff:
Stuart H Rosenbaum
Defendant:
Columbia Banking Systems Inc doing business as Umpqua Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Hoskins v. Aristocrat Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2024cv10021
Plaintiff:
Mary Hoskins
Defendant:
Aristocrat Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
