Personal Injury- Product Liability Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 47
McMullen v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00518
Plaintiff: Cecil P. McMullen, Jr., Cecil P. McMullen, Jr. and Cecil P. McMullen, Jr.
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Harrington v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2008cv00448
Plaintiff: Daniel P. Harrington
Defendant: Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Wilhite v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00315
Plaintiff: Larry P. Wilhite
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Lemay v. Microsoft Software Company et al Featured Case
as 1:2008cv00304
Plaintiff: Steven P. Lemay
Defendant: Microsoft Software Company, Metrocast Cablevision, Google, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HOCEVAR et al v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv02461
Plaintiff: LUISA HOCEVAR and LOUIS P. HOCEVAR
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both
Randall et al v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2008cv02382
Plaintiff: Kenneth P. Randall and Cheryl M Randall
Defendant: Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Sherrer et al v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2008cv02341
Plaintiff: David P. Sherrer and Melissa Sherrer
Defendant: Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anderson et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02349
Plaintiff: Charles Robert Anderson, Albert E. Barnes, Michael Cardamone and others
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Berry v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02086
Plaintiff: Charles P. Berry
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Van Ness v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02088
Plaintiff: Randee P. Van Ness
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?