Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Quilez-Velar, et al v. Ox Bodies, Inc.
as 15-1533
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARTA BONELLI-CABAN, BERARDO A. QUILEZ-BONELLI, CARLOS A. QUILEZ-BONELLI and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO FELIZ-NAVAS
Defendant - Appellant:
OX BODIES, INC.
Defendant:
ABC INSURANCE COMPANY, TRUCK BODIES & EQUIPMENT INTERNATIONAL, INC., DEF INSURANCE CO. and others
Third Party Defendant:
MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, INTEGRAND ASSURANCE COMPANY, ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Quilez-Velar, et al v. Ox Bodies, Inc.
as 15-1466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERARDO A. QUILEZ-VELAR, MARTA BONELLI-CABAN, BERARDO A. QUILEZ-BONELLI and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO FELIZ-NAVAS
Defendant - Appellee:
OX BODIES, INC.
Defendant:
ABC INSURANCE COMPANY, TRUCK BODIES & EQUIPMENT INTERNATIONAL, INC., DEF INSURANCE CO. and others
Third Party Defendant:
MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN, INTEGRAND ASSURANCE COMPANY, ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Paul et al v. Puerto Rico Ports Authority et al
as 3:2013cv01151
Plaintiff:
Bertolacci Paul , Bertolacci Marlaina and Conjugal Partnership Bertolacci-Bertolacci
Defendant:
Puerto Rico Ports Authority , Chartis Insurance Company - Puerto Rico , John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Quilez-Velar et al v. Ox Bodies, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv01780
Plaintiff:
Berardo A. Quilez-Velar , Marta Bonelli-Caban , Berardo A. Quilez-Bonelli and others
Defendant:
Ox Bodies, Inc., ABC Insurance Company, Truck Bodies & Equipment International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Arzola-De-Leon et al v. Dr. Pila Hospital et al
as 3:2007cv01466
Plaintiff:
Suhail M. Arzola-De-Leon, Jose L. Laboy-Arzola, Michael J. Laboy-Arzola and others
Defendant:
Dr. Pila Hospital, Emergency Room of Dr. Pila Hospital, Marcano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
