Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Vanwinkle v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00844
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Atrium Medical Corporation
Plaintiff:
Roger Vanwinkle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kalinger et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2020cv10880
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
Loretta Kalinger and Roger Kalinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turley v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00425
Plaintiff:
Roger Turley
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brockevelt v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP.
as 1:2020cv10555
Plaintiff:
Roger E Brockevelt
Defendant:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp
as 1:2019cv12255
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Eli Rogers
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Atrium Medical Corporation, et al.
as 1:2019cv01144
Plaintiff:
Lee Ann Rogers
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2019cv11969
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Rogers
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plummer v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00472
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Plaintiff:
ROGER PLUMMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lasch et al v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00683
Plaintiff:
Roger Lasch and Judy Lasch
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp
as 1:2018cv11193
Plaintiff:
Joseph V. Rogers, Jr. and Suzanne P. Rogers
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
