Cases 191 - 200 of 6,873
Mcguire v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10731
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Mcguire
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ramlall v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10732
Plaintiff:
Nandrowtie Ramlall
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Grimmage v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10728
Plaintiff:
George Ann Grimmage
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cardenas v. Covidien, LP et al
as 1:2024cv10744
Plaintiff:
Dagoberto Cardenas
Defendant:
Covidien, LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lee v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10713
Plaintiff:
Lavonna Lee
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marney v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10714
Plaintiff:
Melvin Marney
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mason v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10715
Plaintiff:
Janet Mason
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mekni v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10716
Plaintiff:
Annette Mekni
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Montigney v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10719
Plaintiff:
Alfred Montigney, Jr.
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Krauskopf v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv10712
Plaintiff:
Douglas Krauskopf
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
