Cases 61 - 70 of 9,761
Quigley v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11131
Plaintiff:
Ernest L Quigley
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bentley v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11136
Plaintiff:
Dustin Bentley
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Duffy v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11137
Plaintiff:
Eugene Duffy, Jr.
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ibarra v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11113
Plaintiff:
Michelle Ibarra
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fantauzzi v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11107
Plaintiff:
David Fantauzzi
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kuiper v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11108
Plaintiff:
Victoria Kuiper
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Schermerhorn v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11088
Plaintiff:
Donald Schermerhorn
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chavez v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11091
Plaintiff:
Mary Chavez
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tyson et al v. Covidien, LP et al
as 1:2024cv11105
Plaintiff:
Charles Tyson and Jennifer Tyson
Defendant:
Covidien, LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Graham v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2024cv11100
Plaintiff:
Sonya Graham
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
