Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Gonzalez v. UBS Financial Services Inc.
as 23-1624
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FRANCISCO GONZALEZ, as beneficiary of the Royalty Fund Mechanized Cargo Local 1575 and in his capacity as Trustee and Fiduciary of the Royalty Fund Mechanized Cargo Local 1575, RAFAEL CUEVAS KUINLAM, in his capacity as Trustee and Fiduciary of the Royalty Fund Mechanized Cargo Local 1575 and FRANCISCO GONZALEZ, as beneficiary of the Royalty Fund Mechanized Cargo Local 1575 and in his capacity as Trustee and Fiduciary of the Royalty Fund Mechanized Cargo Local 1575 a Welfare Fund
Defendant / Appellant:
UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL CUEVAS KUINLAM, in his capacity as Trustee and Fiduciary of the Royalty Fund Mechanized Cargo Local 1575 a Welfare Fund
Gonzalez et al v. UBS Financial Services Incorporated of Puerto Rico
as 3:2019cv01085
Defendant:
UBS Financial Services Incorporated of Puerto Rico
Plaintiff:
Francisco Gonzalez and Rafael Cuevas Kuinlam
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Gonzalez et al v. UBS Financial Services Incorporated of Puerto Rico
as 3:2019cv01086
Defendant:
UBS Financial Services Incorporated of Puerto Rico
Plaintiff:
Francisco Gonzalez and Rafael Cuevas Kuinlam
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Mercado et al v Cuevas et al
as 3:2014cv01573
Plaintiff:
Rene Mercado , Ramon Rodriguez and Jose Rivera-Sanchez
Defendant:
Rafael Cuevas, Ramon Umpierre-Guadalupe and Rafael Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez-Cuevas et al v. CIGNA Group Insurance et al
as 3:2010cv01446
Plaintiff:
Reinaldo Perez-Cuevas, Linex Moux Davila, Fulano de Tal and others
Defendant:
CIGNA Group Insurance , Ivonne Lucero Cuevas, Insurance Companies A to Z and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Moux Davila et al v. CIGNA Group Insurance et al
as 3:2010cv01445
Defendant:
CIGNA Group Insurance, Ivonne Cuevas, Corporations A to Z and others
Plaintiff:
Linex Moux Davila and Reinaldo Perez-Cuevas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
