Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Alvarado Santiago v. Social Security
as 3:2017cv02103
Plaintiff:
Wendeline Alvarado Santiago
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Santiago v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv30161
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Santiago, Sr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Ocasio-Santiago v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv02317
Plaintiff:
Maureen Ocasio-Santiago
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Davila-Santiago v Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv02134
Plaintiff:
Sandra Davila-Santiago
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security - DEFENDANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Pina-Santiago v. Colvin et al
as 3:2014cv01731
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin, Commissioner of Social Security and U.S. Attorney's Office
Plaintiff:
Luis E. Pina-Santiago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Santiago v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv30034
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Santiago, Sr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Padilla-Gomez, Santiago E.
as 3:2013cv01922
Plaintiff:
Santiago Eduardo Padilla-Gomez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Ruiz Santiago v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv30073
Plaintiff:
Gladys Ruiz Santiago
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Gonzalez-Santiago v. US Attorney for the District of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2012cv01868
Plaintiff:
Nelsia Gonzalez-Santiago
Defendant:
US Attorney for the District of Puerto Rico , US Attorney General and Commisioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Santiago v. Commissioner Social Security
as 3:2012cv01003
Plaintiff:
Bernabe Santiago
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
