Cases 61 - 70 of 229
DOYLE v. FALMOUTH TOWN COUNCIL et al
as 2:2016cv00215
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DOYLE
Defendant:
FALMOUTH TOWN COUNCIL, TOWN OF FALMOUTH and NATHAN POORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION v. LINCOLN PAPER AND TISSUE LLC
as 1:2016cv00206
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Defendant:
LINCOLN PAPER AND TISSUE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION v. SILKMAN et al
as 1:2016cv00205
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Defendant:
RICHARD SILKMAN and COMPETITIVE ENERGY SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DENNISON v. ESTATE OF WENDELL H. DENNISON et al
as 1:2016cv00116
Plaintiff:
CAROLE E DENNISON
Defendant:
ESTATE OF WENDELL H. DENNISON, WENDELL H. DENNISON SEPARATE PROPERTY TRUST, CHRISTIE F HAYWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STINE v. BANK OF AMERICA NA et al
as 2:2016cv00109
Plaintiff:
KEVIN R STINE
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA NA and BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MILL STREAM CORPORATION et al
as 1:2016cv00080
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MILL STREAM CORPORATION and IRA J FRANTZMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR v. WINGER
as 2:2016cv00056
Petitioner:
BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR
Respondent:
LAWRENCE C WINGER
Cause Of Action: Disbarment Proceedings
USA v. ADAM WHITE
as 2:2016cv00041
Movant:
USA
Respondent:
ADAM WHITE
Cause Of Action: Contempt Proceedings
LAPLUME v. STELLAR RECOVERY INC
as 2:2015cv00516
Plaintiff:
DEREK LAPLUME
Defendant:
STELLAR RECOVERY INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
UNION MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. RITCHIE et al
as 2:2015cv00405
Plaintiff:
UNION MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
CHANDRA RITCHIE and ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
