Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Patricia A. Boyd vs. Marvin Lumber and Cedar Co., et al
as 1:2020cv11152
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Friedmann LLP and Patricia A. Boyd
Defendant:
Scott Wynn Wynn Law Group, A.W. Hastings & Co, LLC, Marvin Windows of Tennessee Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schneider v. Fanatic Records LLC
as 1:2017cv11478
Plaintiff:
Fred Schneider , Dan Marshall , Noah Brodie and others
Defendant:
Fanatic Records LLC, FANATIC MANAGEMENT, LLC, ARTFARM LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DeGiacomo v. Butler Rubin Saltarelli & Boyd LLP et al
as 1:2013cv00405
Defendant:
Baker & Daniels LLP, Butler Rubin Saltarelli & Boyd LLP and Faegre Baker Daniels LLP
Plaintiff:
James DeGiacomo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Tamposi v Denby et al
as 1:2010cv12283
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth M. Tamposi
Defendant:
Stephanie Denby , Burke Warren MacKay & Serritella, P.C. , Michael Weisman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyd v. Unicare Life and Health Insurance Company
as 1:2010cv10568
Defendant:
Unicare Life and Health Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Joseph Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Acushnet Company v. Simpson
as 1:2010cv10280
Plaintiff:
Acushnet Company
Defendant:
Allan Boyd Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Caruso v. Macro Air Technologies, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv10316
Plaintiff:
Peter Caruso
Defendant:
Macro Air Technologies, LLC, Walter K Boyd and Edward K Boyd
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Boyd v. BlueSky Brands, Inc.
as 1:2007cv11924
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Boyd and Benjamin Boyd
Defendant:
BlueSky Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Ace American Insurance Company v. Boyd et al
as 3:2007cv30196
Plaintiff:
Ace American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Douglas Boyd and Crear & Chadwell, PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
