Social Security Cases filed in Massachusetts
Cases 31 - 40 of 145
Terhune v. Saul
as 3:2021cv30005
Plaintiff: Ann Marie Terhune
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Forrest v. Saul
as 1:2021cv10073
Plaintiff: Erin Kaye Forrest
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party: Social Security Administation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Cabral v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv10049
Plaintiff: Robert E. Cabral, III
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Kao v. Saul
as 1:2020cv12289
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Christina Kao
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Mendez v. Saul
as 1:2020cv12266
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Silkia Milagros Mendez
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pires v. Saul
as 1:2020cv12252
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Luis Pires
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mckinnon v. Saul
as 1:2020cv12197
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Joanne Mckinnon
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Dasilva Monteiro v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv12189
Defendant: SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Dasilva Monteiro
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cyr v. Saul
as 1:2020cv12179
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Suzanne Marie Cyr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Smith v. Saul
as 1:2020cv12129
Plaintiff: Chanel Taishea Smith
Defendant: SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?