Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Stanley-Coker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv10885
Plaintiff:
Daniel Winston Stanley-Coker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Daniele v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv30118
Plaintiff:
Gina Geraldina Daniele
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Garcia v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv30069
Plaintiff:
Danielle Cozette Garcia
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mercedes Castillo v. Saul
as 1:2021cv10637
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mercedes Castillo
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Daniele v. Saul
as 3:2021cv30031
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Gina Geraldina Daniele
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sargent v. Saul
as 3:2020cv30088
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Danielle J. Sargent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Weeks-Zalowski v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv30117
Plaintiff:
Jenny Danielle Weeks-Zalowski
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Calvino, Jr. v. DeGrace
as 1:2016cv10936
Plaintiff:
Nicholas J. Calvino, Jr.
Defendant:
Danielle DeGrace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Daniels v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv10628
Plaintiff:
Scott Allan Daniels
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Daniels v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv30211
Plaintiff:
Tashia Lynn Daniels
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
