Cases 11 - 20 of 10,151
McCarthy v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts HMO Blue, Inc.
as 1:2024cv11407
Plaintiff:
Daniel F. McCarthy
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts HMO Blue, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harker v. Progress Software Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv11372
Plaintiff:
Shannon Lechele Harker
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation and Delta Dental of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
IQE KC, LLC v. Akoustis Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2024cv91053
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Mafhoum v. Massachusetts State Police
as 1:2024cv11339
Plaintiff:
Khalil Mafhoum
Defendant:
Massachusetts State Police
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Yaghoobi v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
as 1:2024cv11345
Plaintiff:
Vesal Yaghoobi
Defendant:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jiana v. MAYORKAS et al
as 3:2024cv30072
Plaintiff:
Ms. Tida Jiana
Defendant:
Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director UR M. JADDOU and Director Meghann Boyle
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Marden v. Weather Group Television, LLC
as 1:2024cv11349
Plaintiff:
Matthew Marden
Defendant:
Weather Group Television, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Flexport International, LLC v. Grupo PGL Mexico SAPI
as 1:2024cv11327
Defendant:
Grupo PGL Mexico SAPI and Pak
Plaintiff:
Flexport International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
