Cases 21 - 30 of 755
Morales-Monterola, et al v. Garland
as 23-1886
Petitioner:
JESUS MORALES-MONTEROLA, EDITH YAMILETH RODRIGUEZ DE MORALES and VALERY ARIANA MORALES-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Rodriguez-Monserrate
as 23-1807
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
HERMIN RODRIGUEZ-MONSERRATE
Rodrigues, et al v. Garland
as 23-1776
Petitioner:
WILLIAM REGINALDO RODRIGUES, DEBORA SOARES GOMES RODRIGUEZ and W.J.S.R.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
US v. Feliciano-Rodriguez
as 23-1706
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
WILFREDO FELICIANO-RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Wilfre
Interested Party:
JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Rodriguez-Cotto, et al v. Pierluisi-Urrutia, et al
as 23-1626
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SANDRA RODRIGUEZ-COTTO and RAFELLI GONZALEZ-COTTO
Defendant / Appellant:
PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, Governor of Puerto Rico, DOMINGO EMANUELLI HERNANDEZ, Secretary of Department of Justice, ALEXIS TORRES, Secretary of Puerto Rico Department of Public Safety and others
Defendant:
INES DEL C. CARRAU-MARTINEZ
Interested Party:
PEN AMERICAN CENTER, INC. and CLINIC FIRST AMENDMENT UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA LAW SCHOOL
US v. Garcia-Rodriguez
as 23-1629
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEXMARY GARCIA-RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Tatita
US v. Feliciano-Rodriguez
as 23-1520
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
WILFREDO FELICIANO-RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Wilfre
Interested Party:
JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
US v. Rodriguez-Rivera
as 23-1430
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
KERNIS RODRIGUEZ-RIVERA, a/k/a Sosa
US v. Feliciano-Rodriguez
as 23-1405
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
WILFREDO FELICIANO-RODRIGUEZ, a/k/a Wilfre
US v. Suarez-de-Leon
as 23-1409
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
FERNANDO SUAREZ-DE-LEON, a/k/a Chucho, t/n Fernando Luis Suarez-de-Leon
Interested Party:
MABEL MERCADO-LOPEZ, MARIA-DE-LOURDES MARQUES-GARCIA, ALEXIS ROBLEDO-VAZQUEZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
