Other Statutes Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 35
US v. Ponzo
as 14-1906
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: ENRICO M. PONZO, a/k/a Henry Ponzo, a/k/a Michael P. Petrillo, a/k/a Rico, a/k/a Joey, a/k/a Jeffrey John Shaw, a/k/a Jay Shaw
Interested Party: COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT TRANSITIONAL ASSISTANCE
US v. Ponzo
as 14-1548
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: ENRICO M. PONZO, a/k/a Henry Ponzo, a/k/a Michael P. Petrillo, a/k/a Rico, a/k/a Joey, a/k/a Jeffrey John Shaw, a/k/a Jay Shaw
Interested Party: COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT TRANSITIONAL ASSISTANCE
US v. Ponzo We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1528
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: ENRICO M. PONZO, a/k/a Henry Ponzo, a/k/a Michael P. Petrillo, a/k/a Rico, a/k/a Joey, a/k/a Jeffrey John Shaw, a/k/a Jay Shaw
Interested Party: COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT TRANSITIONAL ASSISTANCE
US v. Ponzo
as 13-2521
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: ENRICO M. PONZO, a/k/a Henry Ponzo, a/k/a Michael P. Petrillo, a/k/a Rico, a/k/a Joey, a/k/a Jeffrey John Shaw, a/k/a Jay Shaw
Interested Party: COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT TRANSITIONAL ASSISTANCE
US v. Shaw
as 13-1619
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: VASHON SHAW
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Gangi
as 13-1271
Plaintiff - Appellee: GLOBAL NAPS, INC.
Plaintiff: PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Defendant - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party: AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al
as 12-1102
Plaintiff / Appellee: QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant / Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Defendant / Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachusetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party: CARL F. JENKINS, Receiver, AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC and others
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1327
Plaintiff - Appellee: QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION and AMERICAN REGISTRY FOR INTERNET NUMBERS, LTD.
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachuetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party - Appellee: CARL F. JENKINS, Receiver
Interested Party: AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Global Naps, Inc., et al v. Verizon New England, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1102
Plaintiff: GLOBAL NAPS, INC., PPUC PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, QUALITY SPEAKS, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC., d/b/a Verizon Massachuetts
Defendant: MA DEPT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS & ENERGY, PAUL B. VASINGTON, in his capacity as Commissioner, JAMES CONNELLY, in his capacity as Commissioner and others
Interested Party - Appellant: FRANK T. GANGI
Interested Party: AIR MARYLAND, LLC, BABP, LLC, BROADVOICE, INC. and others
Interested Party - Interested Party: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Intervenor: JOSHUA JUSTICE-POPE
USA v. Shaw
as 1:2011mc00025
Respondent: Kevin C. Shaw
Petitioner: USA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?