Cases 31 - 40 of 60
United States of America v. Pinkney
as 1:2014mc91134
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Martin Pinkney
Polonsky v. Discover Bank et al
as 1:2014cv10876
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Polonsky
Defendant:
Discover Bank, Weltman Weinberg & Reis Co. LPA, James C. Warmbrodt and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bourke et al v. Retained Realty, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv11537
Plaintiff:
Martin Bourke and Doneyn Bourke
Defendant:
Retained Realty, Inc. , Stephen P. Hayes and Hayes & Hayes, Attorneys At Law
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv11388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cox v. Rushie et al
as 1:2013cv11308
Plaintiff:
Crystal L. Cox
Defendant:
Jordan Rushie, Mulvihill and Rushie LLC, Roxanne Grinage and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Lax v. Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv11276
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lax
Defendant:
Palomar Medical Technologies, Inc., Joseph P. Caruso, Jeanne Cohane and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Aston Martin Lagonda of North America, Inc. v. Lotus Motorsports, Inc.
as 1:2013cv11213
Plaintiff:
Aston Martin Lagonda of North America, Inc.
Defendant:
Lotus Motorsports, Inc
Counter_claimant:
Lotus Motorsports, Inc
Counter_defendant:
Aston Martin Lagonda of North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv10755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bryceland v. Minogue et al
as 1:2013cv10212
Plaintiff:
Marta Bryceland
Defendant:
Michael R Minogue , W. Gerald Austen , Louis E Lataif and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities & Exchange Commiss
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
