Cases 31 - 40 of 53
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SMITH
as 1:2011mc00190
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
DAVID L SMITH
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SMITH
as 1:2011mc00191
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
DAVID L SMITH
GOLDENSON et al v. STEFFENS et al
as 2:2010cv00440
Plaintiff:
DANIEL R GOLDENSON , SUZANNE K GOLDENSON , SKG PARTNERS LP and others
Defendant:
JOHN L STEFFENS, GREGORY P HO, SPRING MOUNTAIN CAPITAL GP LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS v. WATSON
as 2:2010mc00236
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS
Defendant:
BERNARD L WATSON
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. STINSON et al
as 2:2010mc00218
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
ROBERT STINSON, JR, LIFE'S GOOD INC, LIFE'S GOOD STABL MORTGAGE FUND LLC and others
Receiver:
KAMIAN SCHWARTZMAN
OAKES v. MOSS
as 2:2010cv00246
Plaintiff:
DAVID J OAKES
Defendant:
JENNIFER L MOSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES MARINE INC et al v. HODGDON YACHTS INC et al
as 2:2010cv00143
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES MARINE INC and VT HALTER MARINE INC
Defendant:
HODGDON YACHTS INC, HODGDON DEFENSE COMPOSITES LLC and DONALD L BLOUNT AND ASSOCIATES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS v. WATSON
as 2:2010mc00015
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS
Defendant:
BERNARD L WATSON
MAINE STATE OF et al v. ALLEN GREIG & PERRY INC et al
as 1:2009cv00484
Plaintiff:
MAINE, STATE OF and ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF
Defendant:
ALLEN GREIG & PERRY INC, AMOCO UNION, BANGOR TIRE CO and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA v. ALLEN GREIG & PERRY INC et al
as 1:2009cv00482
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
ALLEN GREIG & PERRY INC, AMOCO UNION, BANGOR TIRE CO and others
Consol_plaintiff:
MAINE, STATE OF and ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
