Cases 31 - 40 of 202
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2017mc91292
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
Nancy C. Flahive
Cause Of Action: Referral from BK Court - Attorney Discipline
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2017mc91285
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
Christopher McHallam
Cause Of Action: Referral from BK Court - Attorney Discipline
Perales v. City and County of San Francisco Sheriff Department et al et al
as 1:2017cv11509
Defendant:
Phil Daigneau, Sandra Hutchens, J. Pecot e.g and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2017mc91235
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
Timothy J. Teehan
Cause Of Action: Referral from BK Court - Attorney Discipline
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2017mc91232
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
Jospeh Patrick Fingliss, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Referral from BK Court - Attorney Discipline
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2017mc91234
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
Joseph O. Anderson
Cause Of Action: Referral from BK Court - Attorney Discipline
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2017mc91229
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
Charles McKim Mitchell
Cause Of Action: Referral from BK Court - Attorney Discipline
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2017mc91228
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
Charles R. Arthur Jr.
Cause Of Action: Referral from BK Court - Attorney Discipline
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2017mc91230
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
Andrew S. Breines
Cause Of Action: Referral from BK Court - Attorney Discipline
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2017mc91212
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
Dwight Allen Ware
Cause Of Action: Referral from BK Court - Attorney Discipline
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
